<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China’s Exports More to do with Manipulation than Recovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2010/01/13/china%e2%80%99s-exports-more-to-do-with-manipulation-than-recovery.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2010/01/13/china%e2%80%99s-exports-more-to-do-with-manipulation-than-recovery.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shashank Nayak</title>
		<link>http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2010/01/13/china%e2%80%99s-exports-more-to-do-with-manipulation-than-recovery.html/comment-page-1#comment-27470</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashank Nayak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.china-briefing.com/news/?p=6240#comment-27470</guid>
		<description>I have a query, and it would be kind of you if you could answer it. In the National Bureau of Statistics site(China) you find that GDP for 2008(unrevised) to be 30.067 trillion yuan; while the GDP for the first three quarters of 2008 to be 20.163 trillion yuan. This means that GDP for the fourth quarter was 9.904 trillion yuan. Now you can see that the contribution of GDP for fourth quarter to the GDP for the whole year is disproportionately large. Say, if the GDP for all four quarters of 2008 was the same as the fourth, then GDP for 2008 would be 9.9* 4 = 39.6 trillion yuan and not 30 trillion yuan. This question has been troubling me for weeks. Could you answer this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a query, and it would be kind of you if you could answer it. In the National Bureau of Statistics site(China) you find that GDP for 2008(unrevised) to be 30.067 trillion yuan; while the GDP for the first three quarters of 2008 to be 20.163 trillion yuan. This means that GDP for the fourth quarter was 9.904 trillion yuan. Now you can see that the contribution of GDP for fourth quarter to the GDP for the whole year is disproportionately large. Say, if the GDP for all four quarters of 2008 was the same as the fourth, then GDP for 2008 would be 9.9* 4 = 39.6 trillion yuan and not 30 trillion yuan. This question has been troubling me for weeks. Could you answer this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Hicks</title>
		<link>http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2010/01/13/china%e2%80%99s-exports-more-to-do-with-manipulation-than-recovery.html/comment-page-1#comment-27434</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.china-briefing.com/news/?p=6240#comment-27434</guid>
		<description>It is always sensible to be level headed and realistic about statistics, but the fundamental change in the world driven by China&#039;s independence in making economic decisions should never be understimated.  

Will China ever adjust its behaviour to allow the rest of the world time to rebalance?  For its own longer term harmony?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always sensible to be level headed and realistic about statistics, but the fundamental change in the world driven by China&#8217;s independence in making economic decisions should never be understimated.  </p>
<p>Will China ever adjust its behaviour to allow the rest of the world time to rebalance?  For its own longer term harmony?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Hildenbrand</title>
		<link>http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2010/01/13/china%e2%80%99s-exports-more-to-do-with-manipulation-than-recovery.html/comment-page-1#comment-27411</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Hildenbrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.china-briefing.com/news/?p=6240#comment-27411</guid>
		<description>Glad to see someone showing the faults of statistics and sensational headlines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see someone showing the faults of statistics and sensational headlines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

