China Calls for Intensified Foreign-Related and Internet IPR Protection

Posted by Reading Time: 2 minutes

Nov. 25 – China has intensified its emphasis on intellectual property right (IPR) protection recently, especially when it comes to foreign-related and internet issues. It seems November’s theme has been the emphasis on China’s IPR enforcement, following China’s fourth “Patent Week” and the release of the “National Patent Business Development Strategy (2011-2020).”

Circular No.169 (2010), published on the central government’s website on November 23, in particular focuses on the spirit of national IPR protection and enforcement. The circular specifically calls for more foreign-related IPR protection and vows to strengthen the penalty on export and import enterprises that violate IPR. It also says that the government will look for more international cooperation on IPR issues to establish an effective system of warning, emergency responding, overseas IPR defense and dispute solving for companies that involve themselves in overseas investment and international trade industry.

The notice also calls attention to IPR protection in the IT industry – showing a strong determination to crack down on the growing availability of pirated movies and television shows online. In the circular, the government devotes an entire section urging the use of legitimate computer software in all government bodies. It says the government plans to include legitimate computer software purchases into the state fiscal budget in the future.

While China is growing into one of the major FDI destinations with its massive market resources and low-cost labor forces, the prevalence of piracy is also turning into a major concern for foreign investors. Meanwhile, China realizes its developing domestic industries will eventually require more IPR protection as their technologies advance.

A report on China’s IPR protection issued by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of PRC in 2009 illustrates China’s improving IPR-related legislation and international cooperation. In 2009 alone, China dealt with six laws relevant to IP, amending three, releasing two and passing one. The laws covered the regulations on patent, trademark, copyright and IPR issues during import and export and other transactions. The report also lists a series of global collaborations China initiated or participated in last year. It highlights China’s memorandum of understanding with ASEAN countries on IPR issues, multilateral or bilateral cooperation programs with the United States, Japan and EU countries over trademark issues, and a significant amount of customs collaboration programs with those countries.

Benot Battistelli, president of the European Patent Office (EPO) said at an event in Shanghai’s 2010 Expo that China has now become one of the world’s most important countries in patent applications among non-EPO entities and “cooperation between the EPO and SIPO has been pivotal in the creation of a modern system of intellectual property rights protection in China.”

Related Reading
Intellectual Property Rights in China

Our complete guide to registering and protecting trademarks, patents and copyright in China. US$25 (hardcopy) US$40 (pdf)

Microsoft Wins Copyright Damages from China Web Café

China Making Efforts to Improve Intellectual Property Rights Protection

Shanghai Court Awards Record Damages to Microsoft

U.S. Software Company Files US$2.2 billion Lawsuit Against China Computer Manufacturers

1 thought on “China Calls for Intensified Foreign-Related and Internet IPR Protection

    Hugo says:

    I see that it isn´t the core content of the remark but even so let me cite an article from the Boston Globe Journal, published in 2007, titled “A nation of outlaws”. It highlighted that 150 years ago, the powerhouse of the time (UK) used to complain about the unfair trade practices of the emerging power of the time (U.S.). In an excerpt, it pointed out the irritation of the famous writer Charles Dickens who was visiting the Boston in 1842, and became angry when saw pirated copies of his novels on the city´s bookstores that later motivated him to complain to his compatriots, calling it a “monstrous injustice”.

    The article showed many “questionable” trade practices from the U.S. in that age and I only highlighted this one due to the somehow it could be view as an “other side” of the content of your remarks.

    Perhaps one reason that makes history to be fascinating, is that it repeats in cycles…

    Yours sincerely,


Comments are closed.