How to Prioritize IP Enforcement in China: A Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses

This guide sets out a tiered, step-by-step strategy that helps companies with China exposure match their IP enforcement response to the real commercial risk, from routine takedowns to source-level litigation.

Companies operating in China face a growing range of IP enforcement challenges, from trademark squatting and counterfeit goods to unauthorized online sales, copycat products, grey-market distributors, and misuse of product images. These risks can surface across several channels at once: e-commerce platforms, social commerce, trade fairs, offline distributors, suppliers, and export networks.

Meanwhile, China offers several enforcement routes to address them (platform complaints, customs protection, administrative action, civil litigation, and criminal referral) that differ sharply in cost, speed, and impact, and that can often run in parallel. The key question is more practical: which cases deserve which response?

Find Business Support

Get help with IP registration, trademark protection, and enforcement across Asian jurisdictions.

A tiered anti-counterfeiting strategy can help companies with China exposure allocate enforcement budgets where they generate the most deterrence, such as automating routine cases, selectively escalating persistent offenders, and reserving litigation for operations that cause real harm. This guide provides a practical strategy that businesses can use to decide how to respond to different types of IP infringement.

Companies can benefit from a step-by-step strategy for deciding what to monitor, when to escalate, and where to concentrate legal resources.

A tiered strategy for prioritizing IP enforcement in China

Rather than treating every case with the same level of urgency, companies should classify infringement by commercial risk, repeat behavior, and potential harm to the brand.

First, routine infringement should be handled through standardized tools. These are high-volume, repetitive cases, such as obvious counterfeit listings, small sellers, and unauthorized use of trademarks on product pages. They are rarely worth heavy legal intervention and should be addressed through online monitoring, platform takedowns, customs recordal, and warning letters.

Second, persistent infringement should be escalated selectively. These cases include repeat sellers, larger online stores, offline distributors, warehouse operators, and suspect suppliers. They require stronger evidence, such as test purchases, preserved online records, business registration checks, and, where appropriate, administrative enforcement.

Third, major infringement should receive concentrated legal resources. This includes source factories, organized networks, large exporters, and repeat infringers causing serious commercial or safety harm. In these cases, civil litigation, criminal referral, and injunctions may be warranted, often in combination.

Step 1: Secure the rights before enforcement begins

Effective enforcement in China depends on rights that are registered, documented, and clearly owned. Before pursuing takedowns, administrative complaints, or litigation, companies should confirm that the relevant rights are strong enough to support action.

Conduct an IP audit

Companies should first map the assets that may require protection in China, including:

• Core trademarks and logos;
• Chinese-language brand names;
• Product and model names;
• Packaging, trade dress, and product designs;
• Patents, utility models, and design rights;
• Copyrights, software, manuals, marketing materials, and product images; and
• Trade secrets, technical know-how, and confidential business information.

The audit should identify which assets are already protected in China, which remain exposed, and which are most commercially important.

Prioritize trademarks for brand protection

Trademarks should usually be the first priority for brand protection. Companies with China exposure should register:

• English marks;
• Chinese-language marks;
• Logos and visual marks;
• Product names and series names; and
• Relevant product and service categories.

This is particularly important because China operates a first-to-file trademark system, which can leave foreign brands vulnerable to third-party filings before market entry or expansion. Failure to register a Chinese-language version of the brand can also create space for squatters, distributors, or competitors to shape how the brand is identified in the local market.

Use patents and design rights for technical and product features

For products with technical or design value, companies should assess whether additional protection is needed.

• Invention patents may be appropriate for genuinely new technical solutions.
• Utility models can be useful for functional improvements or structural designs.
• Design patents can protect the visual appearance of a product, including shape, pattern, or design features.

Patent filings should explain how the relevant technical features work together to solve a specific technical problem, as this can become important if the patent later faces an invalidation challenge.

Register copyrights where relevant

Copyright protection can provide an additional layer of evidence and enforcement support for creative and commercial materials. Companies should consider copyright registration for assets such as:

• Artwork and packaging designs;
• Product manuals and catalogues;
• Marketing materials and product images;
• Software code; and
• Other original works used in product development or commercialization.

While copyright may arise automatically, formal registration can create a useful record of ownership, particularly where copyright claims support broader trademark, design, or unfair competition disputes.

Record IP with China Customs

Companies engaged in cross-border trade should consider recording relevant rights with China Customs. Customs recordal can help authorities flag suspected infringing goods at the point of import or export, particularly where counterfeit goods may be shipped from China to overseas markets.

Step 2: Control supplier-side risks before disclosure

Vet suppliers for IP risk

Supplier selection should be treated as part of the company’s IP protection strategy. Before engaging a manufacturer, distributor, sourcing agent, or other local partner, companies should assess:

• Whether the supplier manufactures or sells similar products under its own brand;
• Whether it primarily serves domestic or export markets;
• Whether it has experience working with foreign brands;
• Whether it has been involved in prior IP disputes;
• Whether it uses subcontractors or related factories; and
• Whether it has internal controls for confidential files, molds, packaging materials, and restricted production areas.

Where sensitive designs or technical information will be shared, on-site due diligence can help verify the supplier’s claims and assess how confidential materials are handled in practice.

Use China-specific NNN agreements

Companies sharing confidential information with Chinese suppliers may consider China-specific “NNN agreements” covering:

• Non-disclosure: preventing the supplier from sharing confidential information with third parties;
• Non-use: preventing the supplier from using the information to produce competing goods or unauthorized products; and
• Non-circumvention: preventing the supplier from bypassing the brand owner to sell directly to customers or other commercial partners.

For stronger enforceability, these agreements should generally be tailored to the China context, including Chinese-language terms, Chinese governing law, and a clear dispute resolution forum.

Strengthen manufacturing agreements

Manufacturing and supply agreements should reinforce the NNN protections and clearly define the parties’ rights and obligations. Key clauses should address:

• Ownership of pre-existing and newly developed IP;
• Ownership and control of molds, tooling, fixtures, packaging files, and other production assets;
• Restrictions on subcontracting;
• Prohibitions on unauthorized production, overruns, or backdoor sales;
• Rules on use of trademarks, packaging, designs, and technical files; and
• Consequences for misuse of IP, unauthorized sales, or sales to unauthorized third parties.

Control molds, tooling, and inspections

Control over molds, tooling, and critical components can be particularly important for manufacturing-based businesses. Where feasible, contracts should specify rules for storage, access, return, destruction, or transfer when production ends.

Step 3: Build monitoring for routine infringement

Routine infringement should be managed through systems rather than case-by-case legal review. These cases typically include obvious counterfeit listings, small sellers, unauthorized use of marks on product pages, copied product images, and repeated low-value listings.

Build keyword and image-search tools

Monitoring should be supported by keyword libraries covering:

• English and Chinese brand names;
• Abbreviations, misspellings, and informal names;
• Product and model numbers;
• Common descriptive terms used by infringers; and
• Names of known repeat sellers or suspicious distributors.

Price-anomaly alerts can help flag goods sold well below genuine product prices. Image-search tools can help identify copycats that imitate packaging, product appearance, or marketing images without using the brand name.

Standardize routine responses

Clear cases should be handled through standardized tools, including:

• Platform complaint templates;
• Takedown procedures;
• Warning letters;
• Internal approval workflows; and
• Customs alerts where relevant.

Customs recordal should be kept current with authorized manufacturers, licensees, and exporters so legitimate shipments can move while suspicious goods are flagged.

Step 4: Escalate persistent infringement with evidence

Persistent infringement requires a stronger response. This category includes sellers that relist after takedowns, shift to private channels, operate through related entities, or appear linked to warehouses, distributors, or suppliers.

Collect evidence before escalating

Companies should build an evidence file before approaching authorities or filing claims. This may include:

• Test purchases;
• Screenshots and preserved online records;
• Business registration checks;
• Seller, distributor, or warehouse information;
• Product samples, packaging, and invoices;
• Links between online sellers and offline entities; and
• Notarized evidence where required for official proceedings.

Use administrative enforcement where appropriate

For clear-cut trademark and counterfeiting cases, administrative complaints to market regulators can be an efficient escalation tool. They may lead to:

• On-site inspections;
• Seizure of infringing goods;
• Collection of official records;
• Identification of suppliers or distributors; and
• Evidence that can support later civil or criminal action.

Step 5: Reserve litigation and criminal action for strategic targets

High-cost enforcement should be reserved for cases that can produce meaningful deterrence. These typically involve source factories, organized networks, major exporters, repeat offenders, or products that create safety or regulatory risks.

Use civil litigation for commercial remedies

Civil litigation may be appropriate where companies need to:

• Claim damages;
• Seek an injunction;
• Confirm the scope of registered rights;
• Strengthen future enforcement against repeat infringers; or
• Protect packaging, product names, trade dress, or other market-facing assets through unfair competition claims.

In urgent situations, such as trade fairs, product launches, or major sales campaigns, preliminary injunctive relief may help stop infringement before damage expands, where the legal conditions are met.

Use criminal enforcement selectively

Criminal enforcement should be reserved for serious cases with strong evidence and clear statutory thresholds. It is most useful where the objective is to disrupt source-level operations, target organized networks, or send a deterrent signal to the wider market.

Liabilities and final considerations for businesses

Find Business Support

Our experts provide end-to-end M&A advisory across Asia, from target evaluation and due diligence to deal negotiation.

Unmanaged infringement erodes brand value, confuses consumers, strains distributor relationships, and, in regulated sectors, raises real safety and compliance exposure through substandard fakes. Supplier-side leakage can create additional risks, including unauthorized production, backdoor sales, production overruns, and rejected goods entering the market through unofficial channels. Poorly targeted enforcement also carries costs. Relying only on takedowns can invite repeat infringement, while escalating every case can increase legal bills without improving deterrence.

Weak supplier contracts, unclear tooling ownership, and limited factory oversight can leave companies exposed even where trademarks and patents are registered.

A structured enforcement strategy helps companies avoid these problems. By securing rights early, controlling supplier-side risks, automating routine responses, escalating persistent cases selectively, and concentrating resources on strategic targets, companies can turn IP enforcement from a reactive legal function into part of business risk management.

With over three decades of experience, Dezan Shira and Associates is a leading intellectual property service provider in China and broader Asia, offering a deep understanding of IP registration, trademark protection, and market entry consulting. Our dedicated advisors help businesses manage IP risk services, safeguard innovations, and maximize the value of their intangible assets.

Monica Li

Manager

Talk to an expert at China@dezshira.com

Or request a consultation at +86 10 6566 0088

• Previous Article Accounting System Setup for New Hong Kong Subsidiaries: Avoiding Compliance and Reporting Risks
• Next Article