Tax & Accounting

Case Study: Capital Increases and IIT Calculation During Equity Transfers in China

Posted on by

By: James Zheng
Editor: Jake Liddle

Equity transfers are a common component of the mergers and acquisitions process. Taxation of equity transfers are often a complex issue; if entities have incorrectly calculated their tax obligations, then they risk being reprimanded by tax authorities. In this article, a case study will provide a scenario exploring several issues that hinder clear tax declaration when executing an equity transfer.

Case study

An equipment manufacturing company based in Nanjing’s New High Tech Zone (Company D) is a leading enterprise within its industry, with a registered capital of RMB 30.3679 million. It obtained high tech enterprise status in 2015, and before entering the market, had a sales income of RMB 60 million. Its shares are distributed between Ms. Wang, a natural person, who holds 6.55 percent, and a limited responsibility company, hereafter ‘Company A’, which holds 93.45 percent.

In May 2015, Ms. Wang transferred her total shares of Company D to Mr. Li, also a natural person, with a transfer value of RMB 2.09 million. Ms. Wang was represented by Company D’s financial manager at the High Tech Zone’s local tax bureau to declare IIT, and her original capital total was RMB 1,990,465.19. The tax declaration calculation is as follows:

Stamp duty: 2,090,000 x 5 ÷ 10,000= RMB 1,045.

Individual income tax (IIT): (2,090,000 – 1,990,465.19 – 1,045) x 20% = RMB 19,697.96.

The local tax bureau made a due audit of Company D, and discovered that according to the provided financial reports, as of May 31, 2016, its total net assets stood at RMB 50,331,939. Ms. Wang’s corresponding share was RMB 3,296,742 (50,331,939 x 6.55%). Under Article 12 of the State Administration of Taxation’s Administrative Measures on Individual Income Tax on Income Derived from Equity Transfer (hereby referred to as the Measures), which requires that “the declared income derived from equity transfer is less than the net assets corresponding to the equity”, the equity transfer was clearly undervalued. Therefore, the local tax bureau modified the income derived from the transfer according to Company D’s present net assets of RMB 3,296,742. Thus, Ms. Wang was obliged to pay an IIT of RMB 261,046.4 ((3,296,742 – 1,990,465.19 – 1,045) x 20%). Ms. Wang had no objection, and was willing to comply with the appraisal and ratification of the tax department and the amount of tax returns suggested. Proceedings appeared to be going smoothly, until tax officers took issue with Company D’s financial information from the previous three years.

When Company D was established in 1991, its registered capital stood at US$757,700, with Ms. Wang’s original share at 40.89 percent, and Company A’s share at 59.11 percent. The tax bureau discovered that in March 2015, Company A injected RMB 25.5 million in capital into Company D, and when the capital injection was finalized, its registered capital stood at RMB 30,367,800, of which Ms. Wang’s share was 6.55 percent, and Company A’s share was 93.45 percent. The tax bureau took issues with the following:

Professional Service_CB icons_2015RELATED: Tax and Compliance Services from Dezan Shira & Associates

Before the capital injection: Company D’s net assets was RMB 31,403,843.65, and Ms. Wang’s share of the net assets as calculated was RMB 31,403,843.65 x 40.89% = RMB 12,841,032.

After the capital injection: Ms. Wang’s share of the net assets as calculated should have been (RMB 31,403,843.65 + 25,500,000) x 6.55% = RMB 3,727,202.

After the capital injection, where did Ms. Wang’s RMB 9,113,830 go?

Regulatory analysis

There are three main questions to ask:

  1. Did Company A benefit from Ms. Wang during Company D’s capital increase in March 2015?
  2. Was Ms. Wang obliged to pay tax under this capital increase?
  3. How is the transaction taxed?

Firstly, Company A’s net asset share was:

Before the capital injection: RMB 31,403,843.65 x 59.11% = RMB 18,562,811.98

After the capital injection: (RMB 31,403,843.65 + RMB 25,500,000) x 93.45% = RMB 53,176,641.89

Company A’s net asset share increased by RMB 9,113,830 after the capital injection, discounting the capital injection itself (RMB 53,176,641.89 – RMB 18,562,811.98 – RMB 25,500,000). Therefore, Ms Wang’s missing share went directly to Company A. According to the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China, the capital increase is legal as it was an agreement by the board of shareholders. However, a value transfer did occur, and Ms Wang and Company A did not provide an explanation why.

Secondly, according to Article 3 of the Measures, Ms. Wang did not conduct an equity transfer, and therefore has no tax obligation. However, while the local tax bureau does not think that it could lead to a tax evasion case, Ms. Wang could be obliged to pay IIT for the share rights transfer.

Thirdly, Article 4 of the Measures states that, “In the case of equity transfer by an individual, the taxable income amount shall be the balance from deduction of the equity’s original value and reasonable expenses from the income derived from equity transfer, and the individual shall pay individual income tax as per income from transfer of property”. The income derived from the transaction has been confirmed as RMB 3,296,742, and both parties are in agreement. However, the local tax bureau and Company D did not agree on expenses. Ms. Wang and Company D think that the expense of the transfer is the original value of Ms. Wang’s equity share of RMB 1,990,465.19, and the capital increase does not factor in. The tax bureau thinks that during the capital increase, the net asset of Company D had increased, and that therefore, Ms. Wang’s share value had changed. Thus, according to the tax bureau, the expense should be calculated as Ms. Wang’s original share value minus the amount of value transfer during the 2015 capital increase. Here, the value transfer is not classed as income derived from transfer, but still needs to be offset from the expense:

Expense of the transfer: RMB 1,990,465.19 – RMB 9,113,830 = RMB – 7,123,364.81

Taxable amount of this transfer: RMB 3,296,742 – (- RMB 7,123,364.81) – RMB 1,045 = RMB 1,041,9061.81

IIT: RMB 10,419,061.81 x 20% = RMB 2,083,812.362.

Key takeaways

In the event of a shareholder’s capital increase, the portion of other shareholders’ assets will be diluted. This may mean that the shareholders of the diluted shares, in fact, transfer equity value to shareholders who conduct the capital increase. Such transfer of value may not be subject to capital gains tax regarding the capital increase and the subsequent share dilution, but it will have an impact on future transfer of shares as the cost base of capital gains taxes. The case study explored in this article shows that it is important for entities conducting equity transfer during the M&A process to fully consider issues, such as base registered capital and capital increase when declaring tax.


Asia Briefing Ltd. is a subsidiary of Dezan Shira & Associates. Dezan Shira is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in China, Hong Kong, India, Vietnam, Singapore and the rest of ASEAN. For further information, please email or visit

Stay up to date with the latest business and investment trends in Asia by subscribing to our complimentary update service featuring news, commentary and regulatory insight.

Related Reading

Mergers and acquisitions 2016Understanding Mergers & Acquisitions in China
In this issue of China Briefing magazine, we set out to guide foreign investors through the mergers and acquisitions process, from initial market research, to set-up procedures and regulatory hurdles, and finally through important due diligence considerations. With experience in China’s M&A market since 1992, Dezan Shira & Associates is perfectly positioned to ensure that the M&A is the right investment vehicle for your company’s venture into China.

2016 China tax guideTax, Accounting, and Audit in China 2016
This edition of Tax, Accounting, and Audit in China, updated for 2016, offers a comprehensive overview of the major taxes that foreign investors are likely to encounter when establishing or operating a business in China, as well as other tax-relevant obligations. This concise, detailed, yet pragmatic guide is ideal for CFOs, compliance officers and heads of accounting who must navigate the complex tax and accounting landscape in China in order to effectively manage and strategically plan their China-based operations.

Intro to business China 2016An Introduction to Doing Business in China 2016
Doing Business in China 2016 is designed to introduce the fundamentals of investing in China. Compiled by the professionals at Dezan Shira & Associates in June 2016, this comprehensive guide is ideal not only for businesses looking to enter the Chinese market, but also for companies who already have a presence here and want to keep up-to-date with the most recent and relevant policy changes

Understanding China’s VAT Accounting Guidelines

Posted on by

By Dezan Shira & Associates
Editor: Tongyu Zhang

On December 3, 2016, China’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) issued regulations on accounting treatment of Value-added tax (VAT), which immediately came into force from the date of issuance. The latest regulations are presented as guidelines for companies to handle accounting adjustments in advance of the annual reporting deadline. The regulations modify the sub-items under the “tax payable” category, clarify the presentation method of these items in financial statements, and standardize the accounting handling methods for VAT-related businesses. Note that transactions concluded during the period from May 1, 2016 to the effective date of the regulations, whose assets and liabilities are affected, shall be adjusted according to the new regulations. The regulations will prevail if inconsistent with the national unified accounting system.

Continue reading…

An Overview of China’s VAT Reform

Posted on by

By Dezan Shira & Associates
Editor: Alexander Chipman Koty

Hailed as China’s most significant tax reform in over two decades, the value-added tax (VAT) was comprehensively implemented as the country’s only indirect tax in 2016, effectively replacing the business tax (BT) that previously applied to a number of industries. The reform is part of Beijing’s efforts to restructure the Chinese economy from one driven by labor-intensive manufacturing to one that is service-oriented by easing the tax burden on service industries, which have historically paid a disproportionate share.

In 2015, services made up more than half of China’s GDP for the first time, and are growing at a faster rate than any other sector of the economy. The Chinese government envisions the VAT reform to further propel growth in services and consumption as the country pivots away from the low value-added industries. The broader introduction of the VAT is also designed to encourage low-end manufacturers to upgrade their technology and capabilities, and to invest in research and development in order to move up the value chain.

Continue reading…

Understanding China’s Tax Offenders Blacklist System

Posted on by

By Dezan Shira & Associates
Editor: Tongyu Zhang

On April 16, 2016, China’s State Administration of Taxation (SAT) published amended measures to what is known as the blacklist system against tax illegalities, which came into effect on June 1, 2016. The amended measures add a credit repair mechanism to the original system. The SAT describes the updated measure as a ‘one body and two wings’ structure, with ‘one body’ standing for the tax credit system and ‘two wings’ referring to the disclosure of information system, and the joint punishment and administration imposed by relevant authorities and institutions.

Continue reading…

Import-Export Taxes and Duties in China

Posted on by

By Dezan Shira & Associates
Editor: Ari Chernoff

Editor’s note: This article was originally published on March 11, 2013, and has been updated to include the latest regulatory changes.

Over the course of 2016, the Chinese government promulgated a series of new regulations affecting companies that import and export taxable goods and services in China. These new regulations expand on previous import and export taxes and duties, which vary depending on the products involved.

However, at the center of this intricate system is a central list of general principles for foreign companies to abide by. Below, we outline the most significant issues relating to these taxes and duties that foreign companies should take note of.

Continue reading…

An Overview of Transfer Pricing in China

Posted on by

By Dezan Shira & Associates

Transfer pricing has fast become one of the standout issues in international taxation. Put simply, the practice concerns the price charged for intercompany transactions between entities in different tax jurisdictions. These transactions can be used to shift funds within a multinational company (MNC), making transfer pricing an effective means to manage a firm’s finances and remit its profits.

As more international companies began to pour into China following its opening up period in the late 1970s, the need for a transfer pricing regime that could effectively collect tax on intercompany transactions and prevent tax base erosion became increasingly apparent. Legislation on transfer pricing in the Middle Kingdom therefore has a relatively long history that stretches back to the early 1990s, but the majority of this has been piecemeal, and it is only in the last ten years that the country began implementing comprehensive regulations. 2016, in particular, has seen the release of new laws that have revamped transfer pricing compliance for MNCs in China.

Continue reading…

Evaluating China’s VAT Reform – New Issue of China Briefing Magazine

Posted on by

CB 2016 11 issue_Cover_250x350The latest issue of China Briefing Magazine, titled “Evaluating China’s VAT Reform“, is out now and currently available to subscribers as a complimentary download in the Asia Briefing Publication Store.


  • An Overview of China’s VAT Reform
  • Navigating VAT Breaks in China’s Crossborder
    Services Industry
  • Expert Commentary: Expenses not
    Eligible for China’s Special VAT Fapiao

Continue reading…

China’s New Related Party Transaction Reporting Regulation: Implications for Annual Audit in China

Posted on by

By Dezan Shira & Associates
Editor: Jake Liddle

As the end of the financial year looms, key considerations in respect of annual audit should be made by multinational entities (MNEs) operating in China. On June 29, 2016, China’s State Administration of Taxation (SAT) issued a notice regarding reporting of related party transactions and administration of transfer pricing documentation (SAT public notice [2016] No. 42), hereby referred to as ‘Notice 42’, which was overviewed in our previous article. It updates and provides new transfer pricing requirements and special tax revisions previously provided in Guo Shui Fa [2008] No. 114 and Guo Shui Fa [2009] No.2, sections of which have been replaced or annulled. Notably, it details on annual reporting forms for related party transactions (RPT forms), which this article explores in depth.

Continue reading…

Scroll to top